ABOUT


  • We hope that this site will help better integrate EMS into Forest Service adaptive management, and social and organizational learning.

    This is a personal web site, reflecting only the opinions of its authors. Statements on this site do not represent the views or policies of anyone other than the person offering up the views.

    Only "Contributors" may post items. All others encouraged to comment on "posts."

Contributors


  • Dave Iverson

Would-Be Contributors

FS EMS Info (Intranet)

Forest Service Forums

National Forest Blogs

Blog powered by Typepad

« Working Toward a Master List of Environmental Aspects/Impacts | Main | Whiskey Jack Forest and A Simpler Way »

November 02, 2005

Comments

Geneen Granger

Dave - I like the systems approach, but not sure how it will mesh with contractor's process.... this is my attempt to comment!

We had huge thundering pipe clanging in our house pipes, and it turned out that city water pressure coming in was about 10 times higher than it was supposed to be, and Michael had to do some of that pressure stuff, but it started at the line coming in....

dave iverson

G.

My pressure problem too was solved at the line coming in -- by replacing the pressure reduction valve. The expansion tank may help some, but the real problem was pressure too high on the incoming line.

Nice to see you making an attempt to use our new toy.

The systems approach WILL mesh well with whatever approach 'contractors' may espouse. At least it will mesh well if that's what we want.. Contractors work for us, not the other way around.

About tomorrow I'll post up what we came up with as to "activity categories," "activities" and "impacts" at our multi-forest EMS workshop that winds up today at noon. I'll attempt to tie the description bact to a systems approach.

We eventually abandoned our notion of starting with the Manual, and piggybacked our work off what was done up on the three-forest coalition in R6 (Coville, Okanogan-Wenatchee, Wallowa-Whitman). Thanks go to Dick Phillips and CO. for providing us a lead. Also to R1 for their activities, impacts, etc. which are not all that different.

The comments to this entry are closed.