Subject: Forwarded: Judge Dwyer's Fifty Finding of Fact
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comments:
From: Dave Iverson:R04A
Date: May 31,91  5:25 PM
  ** WINDS OF CHANGE: Owls, Old Growth and Logging **
The Forest Service and the Dept. of Agriculture have been noticeably
silent since Judge Dwyer issued his recent precedent-setting
decision.  Rick Wetherill, of R6, succiently summarized Dwyer's
findings.  Here is his short list of findings.  Enjoy.  Dve.

Previous comments:
From: M.Gautreaux:R06F18A
Date: May 29,91  8:39 AM
Rick Weatherill's summary.....

From: GREGORY J. HETZLER:R06F12D05A
Date: May 24,91  1:45 PM
A GOOD SUMMARY OF THE FACTS THAT LED TO DWYERS DECISION.

Previous comments:
From: Richard Wetherill:R6/PNW
Date: May 24,91 12:14 PM
You've probably already heard about the injunction out of Judge
Dwyer's court.  The "Findings of Fact" for the decision took 10 days
of testimony which the Judge boiled down to 20 pages ... and here I've
boiled them down to 3.  These are the calls as I see them -- from my
"unique" viewpoint.  Just so's you'll be ahead of the game.  Have a
good weekend and never panic.
                                        +== Dr. Rick ==+

                        -------========X========-------

                     JUDGE DWYER'S FIFTY FINDINGS OF FACT
                  A Summary Interpretation by Rick Wetherill
                                 May 24, 1991



Background Findings

 1.    The owl is a symbol of the remaining old growth forest.

 2.    Old growth is more than just trees.  Many of its resident plant and
       animal species live nowhere else.

 3.    Ten percent of the original conifer forest is left and the spaces
       protected as parks and wildernesses are not enough for the owl to
       survive in.

 4.    Old growth sustains a richer variety of life than do managed forests or
       tree farms.

 5.    The remaining old growth stands are valued for their effects on climate,
       air, migratory fish runs, and beauty.

 6.    Everything was pretty much OK until intensive logging began after WW II.

 7.    NFMA was adopted in 1976 as both a response to heavy logging and a
       compromise between wilderness and industry values.

 8.    Despite increasing social concern over environment, FS logging sales
       have continued on a large scale (4.448 - 5.082 billion board feet/year).

 9.    Some large firms have private forests and need little or no public
       sources, while many small mills and logging companies are just the
       opposite.

10.    Timber-dependent workers have an expectation of indefinite timber.


Statutory Violations

11.    Timber industry productivity increases will continue and workers will
       suffer anyway regardless of harvest level.

12.    The FS failed to adopt owl guidelines.  The FWS failed to comply with
       ESA.

13.    The reasons for 12 above were in the political arena and outside either
       agency.

14.    Had the FS complied fully with Sec. 318, this case would already be
       over.

15.    The deliberate and systematic refusal by the FS and FWS to comply with
       environmental laws is not at the working level of the agencies, but
       instead reflects decisions made by higher authorities in the executive
       branch.


Time Needed for Forest Serivce to Comply with NFMA

16.    The FS wants at least 16 months to prepare a new ROD and EIS.

17.    "Further delays of this magnitude are neither necessary nor tolerable."

18.    Congress specified that a revised owl plan was to be done by 9/30/90.

19.    Work on the revised plan was stopped by a decision at the cabinet level.

20.    The research and analysis for a plan has already been done.

21.    The new plan could be easily done, therefore, the new EIS and ROD is now
       due on 2/3/92.


Probability of Irreparable Harm

22.    The owl is now threatened with extinction.

23.    The owl population continues to decline.

24.    "Spotted owl habitat" = "suitable habitat" and has been defined the same
       by both FWS and ISC.

25.    400,000 acres of habitat have been logged in the last 7 years without
       having a lawful plan or EIS for owls and an additional 66,000 acres of
       habitat will be destroyed over the next 16 months if allowed.

26.    The ISC Report recommends standards and guidelines.

27.    No timber management activities may take place in HCAs.

28.    Cat. 1 HCAs can be no more than 12 miles, Cat. 2 HCAs no more than 7
       miles, from the nearest neighbor.

29.    50-11-40 rule.

30.    HCAs have been drawn on maps.

31.    ISC Report is scientifically respectable, but has not been adopted by
       any agency.

32.    Proposed logging would foreclose options that might later prove to have
       been necessary.

33.    The FS will consider owl habitat preservation as an alternative -- an
       alternative that would be lost if extensive logging was allowed to go
       forward.

34.    FWS recommendations of "prudent measures" in timber sales reviews are
       not a substitute for NFMA compliance (maintaining viable populations).

35.    Logging 66,000 acres of habitat is irreparable harm.  No amount of money
       can replace the environmental loss of old growth.

36.    There is a substantial risk that logging 66,000 acres would push the
       species past the population threshold from which it could never recover.


Economic and Social Consequences

37.    A 16-month injunction protecting habitat in the owl forests would drop
       the sale level average to roughly 25% of what could be sold consistent
       with the ISC Report.

38.    Existing sales would not be prohibited.

39.    The court projects about a 19-month supply of timber -- most under
       contract and free of legal challenge and the rest to be sold while
       protecting habitat.

40.    Injunction after-effects would be reduced by six months.

41.    Private timber sources and export reductions will take up the market
       slack.

42.    Supply shortages to mills have been exacerbated by raw log exports,
       further impacting domestic jobs.

43.    Mills are going to have shortages anyway.

44.    Modernized and major companies have adapted and done well, smaller firms
       have had trouble.

45.    Wood products industry job losses will continue, whatever happens with
       the owl.  Over 20 years, 30K jobs will be lost to productivity increases
       alone.

46.    The states have programs for dislocated workers.

47.    Payments to counties will decline, regardless.

48.    "The timber industry no longer drives the Pacific Northwest's economy."

49.    Any job loss from short-term habitat protection would have a small
       effect on the regional economy.

50.    Economic gains from amenity values preserved by not harvesting are
       genuine and substantial.