Subject: THE PEOPLE PROBLEM ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Comments: Last week I attended the first gathering of the International Society for Ecological Economics. The topic most discussed was world population growth. Now that the 20 million celebrants of EARTH DAY have returned to their homes to recycle their trash, it's time to focus on more serious problems: The ever-increasing number of us! Ellen Goodman summarized the issue in an editorial some weeks ago. I thought you might want to see it. Dave Iverson... -------========X========------- You Can Talk About the Environment, But People Are the Problem "The darkest tales of the environment usually come to us in neatly labeled scientific packages. The Greenhouse Effect. The Hole in the Ozone. The Destruction of the Rain Forest. Air Pollution. Water Pollution. These headlines reek of chemistry and technology. "But rarely do we see one entitled The People Problem. People, the growing number of us, seem at times mysteriously absent from the public discussion of the state of the Earth. It's as if we talked about carbon-spewing cars without any drivers. "This peculiar split between environmental worries and population growth began a decade ago when birth control became a political issue. Family-planning money was cut. References to population growth were taken out of reports. Politicians were intimidated. "Even environmental groups concerned with endangered species shied away from emphasizing the dangers of our own burgening species. Those who did talk about polulation, like the Audubon Society, were accused by pro-life logicians of making room for birds by getting rid of people. The desire of women across the world for access to birth control got lost in the shuffle. "But the days when presidents, politicians or citizens could cast themselves as advocates of the environment without also being advocates of population limits are gone. Family planners and environmentalists both talk about the "carrying capacity" of the Earth today, as if the planet were a camel and people its straws. "Earth-breaking population growth was the subject of a new report this week from the Population Crisis Committee. They took the United Nations' warning--today's 5.3 billion people could be ten billion by 2025 and 14 billion in a century--and called it 'a preventable disaster.' And they wrote a prescription. "Vice President Dr. Sharon Camp said that during this decade we have a chance, perhaps the last, to stabilize population before government coercion--the China solution--or environmental devastation. The committee figures it will cost international governments $10.5 billion a year to make birth control universally available and raise its use worldwide from about 50 to 75 percent. That's a world-class price tag for what is literally a Whole Earth problem. "It takes no mathematician or economist to see the collision course between the Earth's resources and the numbers of people sharing them. [The Third World is where the news coverage of the problem is most graphic.] It is the story of countries from Kenya to India. Countries where families are caught between feeding their children today or saving the land for tomorrow. "The Third World is not the chief culprit of pollution, nor are people the only environmental danger. In industrial countries each of us annually dumps five tons of carbon into the air; in the developing world, it is one ton. But as Worldwatch Institute's Alan Durning says, 'Underneath it all, the basic question is how many people are consuming how much stuff.' "Children are born, one by one, to a family and culture as well as a world. Slowing the birth rate takes more than money and contraceptives. But we know form experiences in Thailand and Mexico and Zimbabwe how to make a difference. We know that poor women want choices. We know it can't be done without funds. "During the past decade, families lost choices and the world lost time. Now there is a renewed recognition that we are on this rather fragile place, this Earth, together. Three more of us every second. And counting. Ellen Goodman--condensed from her column 3/2/90 in the IDAHO STATE JOURNAL