Greg Mankiw serves up what he calls the Fundamental Theorem of Carbon Taxation:
… Economists recognize that a cap-and-trade system is equivalent to a tax on carbon emissions with the tax revenue rebated to existing carbon emitters, such as energy companies. That is,Yet one more nail in the coffin for rationalizations for "cap and trade" and one more endorsement for setting up "carbon tax" schemes. Or is it? Differing opinions?Cap-and-trade = Carbon tax + Corporate welfare. …
Hill Heat
http://www.hillheat.com/
has ongoing coverage of climate policy. Unfortunately, it's low traffic so far.
Posted by: Seth Baum | August 02, 2007 at 12:34 PM
I'm not sure why this is even a question. Cap and trade says this isn't a serious problem. We can go on with business as usual while diverting some resources to mitigating the "perceived" problem. Carbon tax on the other hand says we have a real problem that requires a reduction in carbon emissions. What nuance am I missing?
Posted by: Trinifar | August 18, 2007 at 09:20 PM
We enjoy your blog and have linked it to our site. I was hoping we could exchange links.
Our blog My Green Element, www.mygreenelement.com covers all issues related to sustainable communications.
The Element Agency is a green communications and marketing agency. See our homepage at www.theelementagency.com.
Please let me know what you think. By the way, we welcome guest bloggers.
Best,
Stefan
Posted by: stefan | August 23, 2007 at 01:07 PM